Types of Surveillance Investigators Use and the Law Behind Each
The main types of surveillance investigators use are static, mobile, foot, photographic and video, audio, vehicle tracking, and online research. The law that applies depends on the tool, not the tactic.
By Sharon DeCet, Founder · Updated 25 Oct 2026

Key takeaways
- Investigators use seven methods, and the legal risk concentrates in two of them: audio recording (federal wiretap law) and GPS (Global Positioning System) trackers (state tracking statutes).
- Watching, following and photographing are limited mainly by where you stand, so the test is whether the subject is somewhere any member of the public could see them.
- A client's wishes do not authorize a tracker. Texas and California both turn on the consent of the vehicle's owner or lessee, and California has no exception specific to investigators.
- A certificate of completion is not a license, so confirm your state's rules before you count on any course.
In this article
- 1What are the main types of surveillance investigators use?
- 2Which types of surveillance can get an investigator charged?
- 3Why should you sort surveillance methods by legal risk instead of by technology?
- 4What should you check before starting a surveillance job?
- 5What does surveillance work ask of you, and which training fits?
- 6Frequently asked questions
In our judgement, watching someone is rarely what puts an investigator in legal trouble. Recording what that person says, or attaching a device to their car, is.
This page defines each method, shows the rule that governs it in one table, and gives five tests to run before a job starts.
This page covers surveillance as private investigators practice it. If you searched for disease surveillance (passive, active, sentinel or syndromic), that is a public health field, and the CDC's training page on public health surveillance is the place to start.
What are the main types of surveillance investigators use?
Investigators use seven methods. Three describe how you watch (static, mobile, foot). Four describe what you use (photography and video, audio recording, GPS tracking, online research). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics describes the core task as keeping watch "through binoculars or take photographs, often from a hidden position" (BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, last modified August 27, 2026).
- Static surveillance: observing a fixed spot, such as a doorway or driveway, from one position.
- Mobile surveillance: following a subject in a vehicle.
- Foot surveillance: following a subject on foot.
- Online research: collecting what is publicly posted, often called open source intelligence (OSINT).
Use this table before every job. Each test is a yes/no question, and a "no" means stop and read your state's law.
| Type | What you do | Rule that governs it | Test before you do it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Static | Watch a fixed spot from one position | Your state's trespass, harassment and stalking laws | Can you see the subject from a place any member of the public may stand? |
| Mobile | Follow a subject by vehicle | Same laws, plus traffic laws | Do you stay on public roads and public property for the whole route? |
| Foot | Follow a subject on foot | Same laws, plus property lines | Do you stay out of places that are private or closed to the public? |
| Photo and video | Photograph or film from a lawful position | Reasonable expectation of privacy (the point where a person can fairly expect not to be watched, such as inside a home) | Are you filming only what a passerby could see, never through a window, a fence gap or into a private room? |
| Audio recording | Record sound or conversation | 18 U.S.C. § 2511 and your state's recording law | Are you a party to the conversation or has a party consented, and does your state also allow one-party consent? (California Penal Code § 632, for example, requires every party's consent.) |
| GPS tracker | Place a device on a vehicle | State tracking statutes, such as Texas Penal Code § 16.06 and California Penal Code § 637.7 | Do you hold written consent from the vehicle's registered owner or lessee? |
| Online research | Collect public posts and records | Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030) and Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. § 2701): getting into accounts or devices you may not open is a different act | Did every item come from a source anyone can open, without bypassing a password? |
Covert and undercover work is a separate job with its own rules; our Undercover Investigator page covers it.
Which types of surveillance can get an investigator charged?
Any method can lead to charges if misused: audio recording and GPS trackers are criminal in themselves unless a consent exception applies, while watching and photographing become crimes through trespass, harassment or stalking. Those laws differ by state.
Audio. The federal wiretap statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2511, prohibits intentionally intercepting wire, oral or electronic communications. It exempts a person who is a party to the communication, or where a party has given prior consent, unless the purpose is criminal or tortious (meant to cause a civil wrong such as invasion of privacy). A violation can bring a fine, up to five years in prison, or both. Read the exception closely: an investigator who is not part of a conversation and has no party's consent cannot rely on it. Some states add stricter recording rules of their own, so check yours.
GPS trackers. No single national rule applies, and the two statutes we read show why:
- Texas. Texas Penal Code § 16.06: installing a tracking device on a vehicle owned or leased by another person is a Class A misdemeanor. It is an affirmative defense (a defense the accused must raise and prove) if the person had the owner's or lessee's consent, or if a licensed private investigator had that owner's or lessee's written consent (plus the property owner's or lessee's written consent if residential entry was needed) or a court order. Peace officers acting in a criminal investigation or under a court order are exempt.
- California. California Penal Code § 637.7 bars using an electronic tracking device to determine a person's location or movement. Its exceptions are the consent of the registered owner, lessor or lessee, and lawful law-enforcement use. It names no exception for private investigators. A violation is a misdemeanor, and licensed professionals face potential license revocation.
In both states, what matters is whose name is on the registration, not who hired you. Our reading is that a client who is not the registered owner or lessee cannot give that consent. Confirm the current text on your own state legislature's site, because these statutes get amended.
United States v. Jones (decided January 23, 2012) held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring it is a Fourth Amendment search (a government intrusion that requires a warrant or an exception). The case involved government agents, so state statutes, not Jones, set the rule for a private investigator.

Why should you sort surveillance methods by legal risk instead of by technology?
Sorting surveillance methods by technology puts a camera and a tracker under the same label, but the law treats them differently. A technology list tells you what exists. A legal sort tells you what you may do on a given Tuesday in a given state. The two categories need different decisions. Our recommendation is to sort every method by the question it forces you to answer first: where am I standing, whose consent do I have, or whose account am I opening?
What should you check before starting a surveillance job?
Run five tests before the first hour of a job, and stop on any fail.

- Vantage testPass: you can see the subject from a place any member of the public may stand. Fail: you need to enter private property or look through a window.
- Audio testPass: you record video only, or you are a party to the conversation or a party has consented, and your state also allows one-party consent (California Penal Code § 632, for example, requires every party's consent). Fail: you would capture a conversation you are not part of.
- Tracker testPass: you checked your state's tracking statute and hold the consent it requires (written consent from the registered owner or lessee in Texas and California). Fail: you have only the client's verbal instruction.
- License test
Pass: your state licensing board's website confirms the work you are about to do is covered by your license class. Fail: the board does not list it or you cannot find it. Our Private Investigator Laws page explains what a license does and does not cover.
- Record test
Pass: every photo, video and note carries a date, time, place and the name of who captured it. Fail: any item has a gap you could not explain in court. Our Chain of Custody guide covers what to log.
What does surveillance work ask of you, and which training fits?
Check your state's rules on licensing before you take surveillance work for hire (see Private Investigator Laws).
Our Surveillance course costs $80 as of October 2026. It is a 4-hour, self-paced course with rolling access and a certificate of completion. It covers the uses and types of surveillance, photographic and electronic surveillance, targets, and tips and tricks of the trade. It has 6 chapters and 32 lessons, with six assessments totaling 88 questions.
The course page lists 4 continuing education units (CEUs) in 13 states: Georgia, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, Oregon, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, Tennessee, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas. Whether your licensing board accepts it for your renewal is the board's decision, so confirm with the board first.
For the record-keeping tests above, we also offer Collection and Preservation of Evidence, Note Taking, and Report Writing. To compare surveillance training across providers, see Which Investigator Certification Teaches Surveillance Best?
To ask which course fits your state, call us at (832) 922-1215 or (706) 268-2221, Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM EST, or start at learningshopusa.online.
Find surveillance training that fits your state
Frequently asked questions
Sources
- 1.U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Private Detectives and Investigators, Occupational Outlook Handbook (last modified August 27, 2026)
- 2.18 U.S.C. § 2511, Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- 3.18 U.S.C. § 1030, Fraud and related activity in connection with computers (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- 4.18 U.S.C. § 2701, Unlawful access to stored communications (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- 5.Texas Penal Code § 16.06, Unlawful installation of tracking device (texas.public.law)
- 6.California Penal Code § 637.7, Electronic tracking devices (california.public.law)
- 7.United States v. Jones, decided January 23, 2012 (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Introduction to Public Health Surveillance


